양수금
1. The defendant jointly and severally with B Co., Ltd. within the limit of KRW 240,00,000 to the plaintiff 115,609,792 and 66.
According to the overall purport of the statements and arguments by Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 4 (including each number), each of the following facts is acknowledged (However, the "creditor" is deemed to be the "Plaintiff," and the "debtor" to be the "Defendant," respectively. Thus, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified, and it is so decided as per Disposition by the assent of all participating Justices.
(1) The Plaintiff asserted that the Plaintiff did not read the Plaintiff’s signature and seal and did not know the contents of the Plaintiff’s certificate at the time. However, the Plaintiff’s signature and seal to the Plaintiff’s seal is presumed to have established the entire document due to the lack of dispute as to the Plaintiff’s seal, and the Plaintiff’s seal and seal to submit the document to receive the reward without viewing the content of the letter of guarantee is included in this case, and thus, it is necessary to have reasonable grounds and supporting evidence to reverse the authenticity of the document. In addition, the Plaintiff’s above assertion in light of the Plaintiff’s location of the Plaintiff’s signature and seal, the process of the preparation of the letter of guarantee, and the social norms, etc., of the letter of guarantee, is insufficient to acknowledge the authenticity of the document, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it, and it is difficult to accept the Plaintiff’s above assertion in light of the Plaintiff’s position of the Plaintiff’s signature and seal column, the Plaintiff’s signature and seal, even if the Plaintiff believed the above assertion,