2. It is recognized that the Defendant recognized all the facts charged of this case, that the Defendant suffers from depression, etc., and that the Defendant must support his mother, wife, and his child, etc. However, the crime of arranging the sexual traffic of this case is highly harmful to society because the crime of this case was committed with a fine for the same kind of crime, and that the Defendant committed the crime of this case again even if he was punished for the same crime, for a period of more than one year, and the size of business seems to be considerable, and considering all the conditions of sentencing specified in the records and arguments of this case, such as the Defendant’s age, character, environment, family relationship, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable. Thus, the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.