집행문부여의소
1. The Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2009 Ghana73936 Decided between the Co., Ltd. and the Defendant.
1. The facts of the Plaintiff’s claim as to the Plaintiff’s claim are as shown in the separate sheet, and it can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking account of the facts that there is no dispute or no clear dispute, and the purport of the entire entries and arguments set forth in Gap evidence 1 through 3 (including paper numbers).
Therefore, regarding the Seoul Eastern District Court Decision 2009Gaso73936 case, the Seoul Eastern District Court has the duty to grant the execution clause to the plaintiff, who is the successor of the Ilil Mutual Savings Bank, for compulsory execution against the defendant.
2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified and acceptable.