[2] On September 4, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for night residence theft, etc. at the Suwon District Court, which is the appellate court, but on November 27, 2015, the Defendant was remanded to the Supreme Court on November 27, 2015, and was released on January 17, 2016 after the release of detention cancellation decision on February 17, 2016 and completed the execution of the sentence on February 25, 2016, when the judgment became final and conclusive, on January 17, 2016.

On October 10, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to three years and six months of imprisonment with prison labor by the Seoul Central District Court for robbery, etc., and is still pending in the appellate trial trial. On November 29, 2016, the Defendant was sentenced to eight months of imprisonment with prison labor at the Seoul Central District Court for fraud, etc. and is still pending in the appellate trial.

[2] The Defendant, separate co-defendant C (hereinafter “C”), and D, on February 2, 2016, conspiredd to consume a mobile phone in the name of the Defendant, C, the Defendant, and C using his/her personal registration certificate under the name of another person in the name of another person in the mobile phone agency in the Defendant, C, the Defendant, and C, the mobile phone agent, dispose of the said mobile phone to a third party and use it for entertainment expenses, etc.

1. Joint crimes committed by the defendant and C;

A. On April 18, 2016, the Defendant and C filed an application for joining one mobile phone (i.e., one mobile phone) with the victim R in Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu P around April 18, 2016, according to the aforementioned public offering. Around April 18, 2016, the Defendant and C filed an application for joining one mobile phone (i.e., one mobile phone) as if the Defendant were the same person as the applicant for joining, and (ii) as if the Defendant would normally pay the cost of use and the end fee after opening the mobile phone.

However, the defendant, C, and D did not have any connection with G in the name of the applicant for membership, and even if they received one cell phone from the injured party, they immediately disposed of it to a third party and considered it to prepare entertainment expenses, and the above mobile phone mobile phone charges and charges.