If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

At around 20:20 on July 31, 2016, the Defendant issued a cleaning agent with the victim C (21 years of age) of the same ward in the Dong-dong prison in Adong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, and the Defendant was able to write off the Defendant’s “A cleaning agent who is not an employee or an employee, but does not have any time to do so.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police statement with respect to C and D, and a written statement of E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of penalties;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant did not know about the punishment in prison and reached the crime in this case, and that the defendant had the same power is disadvantageous to him.

However, although the degree of injury of the victim is not less severe, the condition of sentencing, such as family relation, growth environment, age, etc. of the defendant, shall be determined in full view of the circumstances in which the victim committed the crime in this case and the defendant committed the crime in this case, and the defendant committed the crime in this case.