However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant is an overseas Korean (F-4) who entered the Republic of Korea with a visa on December 12, 2015.

피고인은 2015. 11. 16. 경 키 르기 스스 탄 비쉬 켁 아크 훈 바 예 브 35 번가 소재 키 르기 스스 탄 대한민국 대사관에서, 일명 ‘C’ 라는 브로커에게 6,000 달러를 주고 사실은 피고인의 어머니가 고려 인의 후손이 아님에도 고려인인 것처럼 위조된 출생 증명서를 교부 받은 후, 사증 발급 신청서를 제출하면서 위와 같이 위조된 허위 출생 증명서를 첨부 서류로 제출하여 외국 국적 동포에게만 발급되는 재외동포 (F-4) 사증을 발급 받았다.

Accordingly, in collusion with the above “C”, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of duties by a public official in charge of issuing visas belonging to the Embassy of the Republic of Korea of the Republic of Korea, and applied for a visa falsely.

Summary of Evidence

Application of the defendant's statutory visa issuance application, birth certificate statute

1. Article 137 and Article 30 of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of public duties by fraudulent means) concerning the facts constituting an offense, Article 94 subparagraph 3 of the Immigration Control Act and Article 97-2 subparagraph 2 of the Immigration Control Act, Article 30 of the Criminal Act;

2. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition.

3. Selection of sentence of alternative imprisonment;

4. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (it shall be considered that there is no record of crime in the Republic of Korea, and that the case is subject to compulsory eviction due to this judgment).