However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On February 23, 2015, the Defendant, at the Defendant’s house located in Busan Jung-gu Busan, administered approximately 0.03 grams of psychotropic drugs, on the water, and administered Maitius narcotics, etc. on the water, around February 23, 2015.

2. Even if the Defendant is not a narcotics handler, on February 23, 2015, around 21:00, the Defendant administered 0.03g of phiphonephones on the water at the place indicated in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes notifying the records of seizure and the results of legal chemical appraisal;

1. Articles 60 (1) 2, 4 (1), and 2 subparagraph 3 (b) of the Act on the Management of Narcotics, etc. under Relevant Acts concerning criminal facts, and choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act to increase concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act concerning probation or order to attend a lecture;

1. The suspension of the execution of imprisonment shall be sentenced on probation, etc. on the condition that the defendant has no basic area (10 to 2 years) (10 to 2 years) of types 3 (10 to 10 years) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (the scope of recommendations), medication, simple possession, etc. (10 to 10 years) (10 to 2 years) of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. subject to additional collection (the decision of sentence), taking into account the fact that the defendant has no record of criminal acts