When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

To the extent that it does not harm the identity of the facts charged and the defendant's right to defense, part of the facts charged was organized and stated.

At around 02:30 on August 15, 2019, the Defendant entered the 'C' restaurant located in Seocheon-si B, Seocheon-si B, and entered the 'C' restaurant, but from her employee D, "it is impossible to get a guest due to the expiration of the closing time', the Defendant left the 2nd entrance door of the above cafeteria, and let the Defendant do not function as the automatic door.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the automatic door owned by the victim whose name is unknown to the extent that the repair cost is KRW 70,000.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Written statements of D;

1. Reports on internal investigation by the police;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on site photographs and CCTV images to captures;

1. Article 36 of the Criminal Act and Article 366 of the Criminal Act concerning the crime, the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The confession and reflection of the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order, the reimbursement of the expenses for the automatic acceptance of the judgment, and other circumstances shown in the records and arguments, including the defendant's age, character, conduct, environment, criminal records and period up to recidivism, motive, means and consequence of the crime in this case, and the circumstances after the crime, shall be determined as ordered by the order, comprehensively taking into account.