Article 44 (2) of the Game Industry Promotion Act shall be governed by the provisions of paragraph (1).

2. It is recognized that the circumstances, such as the confession of the Defendant to commit the instant crime and the reflection of his mistake, the fact that there was no record of punishment for the same crime, and the game machine provided for the instant crime, etc. have been seized.

However, it is highly harmful to society by encouraging the business of the illegal game room through the speculative program and undermining the will to work of the general public. The crime of this case is about 10% of the commission for exchange in collusion with the defendant, the business owner of the "C Gameland", who is the business owner of the "C Gameland", in order to exchange intangible results acquired through the use of the game water for about 4 months in collusion with the name in order to exchange them. The crime of this case is very poor in light of the criminal law and contents, etc., such as correction of the entrance and attempt to avoid control by installing the CCTV for surveillance, etc.

In full view of internal points, it is not recognized that the sentence imposed by the court below is too unreasonable because the sentence imposed by the defendant is too large.

Therefore, we cannot accept the defendant's above assertion.

3. The defendant's appeal is without merit. Thus, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.