However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

1. On October 18, 2016, the Defendant signed a private signature: (a) around 21:44, at the charge of the police station in Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-gu, 620, and the B team office in Ulsan-gu; (b) the name and resident registration number of the Defendant E, who is the punishment of the Defendant, in order to conceal the fact that he/she was suspected of assault and assault against D by the slope C belonging to the said police station, and entered the name and resident registration number of the Defendant in the “E” in the statement column of the Defendant’s newspaper protocol prepared by the said slope C.

Accordingly, for the purpose of exercising authority, the Defendant forged the above E’s signature without authority.

2. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article, committed both the signature of the above E, which was recorded in the above suspect interrogation protocol without authority, with the intention to exercise the right, and exercised the signature of the above E in the name of the E, by submitting the above slope C to the above slope C a written protocol for the interrogation of the suspect whose name was forged, and allowing the above slope C to file the written protocol for the interrogation of the suspect whose name was forged with the investigation record as above.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol of examination by the person under question (a list of evidence No. 1);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of the investigative report (Evidence Nos 2 and 3)

1. Counterfeit the signature of a relevant legal professional on criminal facts: The exercise of signature on the above investigation under Article 239 (1) of the Criminal Act: Articles 239 (2) and 239 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (referring to the part of favorable circumstances for sentencing as follows):

1. Circumstances favorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act: The confession and the depth reflects, and the fact that there is no previous conviction exceeding the fine;

(i) Unfavorable circumstances: The fact of deceiving a judicial institution, the fact that a criminal record of a fine is reasonable, and the same criminal record is also true;