beta
(영문) 광주지방법원 2013.08.23 2013고정1310

공무집행방해등

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of four million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 7, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 19:40 on May 7, 2013, 2013, the Defendant destroyed the victim’s “E” operated by Gwangju Northern-gu, by drinking alcohol, and going through singing by the victim; (b) the consignee in the place was shot up, and then the consignee was shot up, thereby damaging the floor by cutting down the 200,000 won in total of the market prices on the customer.

2. On May 7, 2013, the Defendant obstructed the disturbance by: (a) around 20:20, at the F District District District of the Gwangju Northern Police Station located in the Dongdong-dong-dong-gu, Gwangju; (b) at the slope G located in the said District-dong-dong-dong-dong-gu, the Defendant was suspected of causing property damage and damage to the facts described in paragraph (1); (c) and (d) making it difficult for the police officers located in the said District-dong-dong to escape the disturbance, such as making the larger sound “the

Accordingly, the Defendant taken a cell phone with the cell phone owned by the above H, and the Defendant: (a) dumpedly sounded “hyp fark far.” (hereinafter “hyp fark”); (b) dump far the coffee contained in the instant instant instant instant smartphone, thereby spreading the coffee toward H; and (c) dumped the said smartphone, thereby getting off the Defendant’s arms.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers concerning the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements of D;

1. The police statement of H;

1. Application of statutes on site photographs;

1. Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstruction of performance of official duties) and Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destruction and damage of property), the choice of each fine for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act or more;