A. On April 18, 1996, the counterclaim Defendant has two children married with C on April 18, 1996.

Since February 2017, the Lessee was in conflict with C and committed an unlawful act.

B. Around 08:00 on May 5, 2017, the counterclaim Defendant: (a) reported the Plaintiff’s face, etc. of the Lessee with C in front of the Mocheon-si Macheon-si, and plicked, plicked up the left hand of the Lessee.

As a result, the Lessee suffered injury, such as the upper left-hand 42-day treatment of approximately 42 days of treatment, such as the steel frame of the third middle balance.

The summary order (based on recognition), in which case Gap's evidence No. 1 through 7 and No. 111 are written or video, and the purport of the whole pleadings, in which case the District Court 2018 High Court 2018 High Court 16849 was affirmed

2. Determination on the cause of the counterclaim

A. According to the facts found above, the counterclaim Defendant is liable to compensate the counterclaim for the damages suffered by the counterclaim due to the illegal harmful act committed by the counterclaim Defendant.

B. Medical expenses 1) Medical expenses: 2,497,060 won (the sum of medical expenses spent from May 5, 2017 to June 15, 2017, and medical expenses receipts of evidence B-2 to 13, 2017, and the aggregate of patient burden) the counter-party Defendant stated in the column for hospitalization in the nursing information investigation site (Evidence B-5) (Evidence B-5) “The left hand, left hand, and the left verts, incurred on May 5, 2017, plus Lt.hand, Ltbpain, Ltbpathin, which took place, that “the above counter-party medical expenses incurred from the counter-party to the counter-party to the counter-party to the counter-party to the counter-party to the counter-party to the counter-party to the counter-party to the claim that the treatment expenses incurred in the counter-party to the counter-party to the counter-party to the counter-party to the counter-party to the counter-claim to the effect that the injury would have occurred more than assault the Defendant to the counter-party to the counter-party.