대여금반환
The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.
The costs of appeal are assessed against the plaintiffs.
The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.
1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following cases. Thus, we accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
[Supplementary part] The part written in the judgment of the court of first instance, Nos. 2, 2, written in the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be filled with “the Plaintiff” as “the network A (hereinafter “the network”).
Each “Plaintiff” of the first instance judgment Nos. 7, 12, 14, 15, 21, 3, 5, 7, 10, 12, 14, 16, and 4, 7, 12, 7, 14, 16, and 2, 7, 12, 14, 7, 14, and 4, 7, and 7, respectively, shall be applied to “Plaintiffs.”
The following shall be added after the second page of the judgment of the first instance.
“C. After having appealed against the judgment of the court of first instance, the deceased died on February 3, 2020, which was pending in the appellate trial, and the plaintiffs, who were the deceased’s children, inherited 1/4 each of the deceased and taken over the lawsuit. The deceased’s 2nd to 17th to 19th as follows.
"Therefore, the defendant is liable to pay to the plaintiffs, the inheritor of the deceased, 27,359,680 won of the principal remaining after appropriation as stated in the attached sheet of "payment and calculation of principal and interest" and to pay the agreed interest at the rate of 2% per month from July 13, 2019 to the day of full payment, according to the respective inheritance rates of the plaintiffs.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim of this case should be dismissed as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is just in conclusion, the plaintiffs' appeal against this is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.