매매대금반환
1. Of the instant lawsuit, the part demanding the payment of 805,490 won for demand procedure costs shall be dismissed.
2. The defendant.
1. It is as shown in the grounds for the attachment of the claim to indicate the claim (Provided, That the "creditor" shall be "the appointed party or the sperm" and the "debtor" shall be "Defendant", respectively). 2. The judgment by service by publication on public notice (Article 208 (3) 3 of the Civil Procedure Act)
3. The plaintiff (the appointed party) sought payment of KRW 805,490 for the demand procedure expenses related to the application for the payment order of this case to the defendant. However, since the amount paid as the litigation expenses can be repaid after the judgment became final and conclusive, there is no benefit in filing a lawsuit separately (see Supreme Court Decision 9Da68577 delivered on May 12, 2000, etc.). The part demanding the payment of the demand procedure expenses of this case among the lawsuit of this case is unlawful and dismissed.