2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

A. On September 2, 2014, the Plaintiff leased “D gas stations” in the Dong-gu Daejeon District of Daejeon (hereinafter “D gas stations”) from B, and is a petroleum retailer operating from September 20, 2014.

B. On October 20, 2014, the Institute and the Daejeon District Police Agency (hereinafter “the Control Group”) jointly collected samples from the instant gas station and conducted a quantitative inspection at around 10:50, and as a result, it was confirmed that:3 of the four main gas stations in light of light oil (1, 2, 3) and four main gas stations in gasoline (5, 6, 7, 8) were sold at least 1,270 m3, a maximum of 1,745 m3m3 (20 m3) out of the 150m3m3 of the used vehicle (20 m3).

C. On October 27, 2014, the Defendant was notified of the aforementioned fact by the Daejeon Chungcheongnam Headquarters, and on December 2, 2014, the Defendant was notified by the Daejeon Daejeon District Police Agency that the modification program of the amount of flow was discovered in the main organic note 1, 2014, excluding the main organic abandonment No. 8 of the inspection number.

On October 20, 2014, at around 10:50 on October 20, 2014, a disposition of an administrative disposition due to a violation of subparagraph (b) of the intended disposition of "petroleum and Petroleum Substitute Fuel Business Act" was imposed and sold below the fixed quantity by getting out of 7 vehicles used (0.75%) at a fixed-type D gas station business establishment, and notified that he/she installed, remodeled, and used a de facto medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium medium

D. The Defendant’s following content regarding the Plaintiff on November 18, 2014.