Defendant,

1. On August 19, 2012: (a) inputs a password prior to a public announcement tele-gu, Suwon-si B, Suwon-si, and brings a fluor, on the other hand, the victim C owned by the victim C, located at the new outlet at the entrance of five floors of the said public announcement, bringing about a fluorial grodial frodial, the market price of which is equivalent to KRW 150,00,000; (b) continuously taking one fluorial frodial frodial, the victim D’s market price owned by the victim D, the six stories of which is equivalent to KRW 8,00, 200;

2. On August 25, 2012, around 22:00, the entrance was opened in front of the residence of the victim F of the victim F in Suwon-si E 102, and the entrance was opened and the victim was intruded into the room, and the victim was locked with the market price of KRW 60,000,000, the market price of the victim’s possession, which is set up in the plan by means of the cresh, was 60,000.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

Summary of Evidence

1. Police suspect interrogation protocol of the accused;

1. The written statement of the defendant;

1. Written statements C, D, and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning field photographs and CCTV suspended images;

1. Article 330 of the Criminal Act applicable to the crime;

1. From among concurrent crimes, the punishment under the former part of Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is [the scope of recommending punishment] the mitigated area (8 to 1 year and 6 months) of the mitigated area (8 to 1 year) of the Criminal Act for general property [the decision of sentencing] the living-type crime [the decision of sentence] six months (the decision of sentence is made] by imprisonment for six months (the fact that the amount of damage is not significant, the fact that the amount of damage is not significant, in light of the statement made by the investigative agency, a punishment which is lower than the recommended sentence shall be imposed