When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

On July 12, 2014, at around 23:04, the Defendant found D(17 years of age, south) in front of the C cafeteria in Seopo-si B, Seopopo-si, that he was dissatisfied with the C cafeteria operated by the victim E (50 years of age, in order to assault the son out of the son, and the son was employed by the son as a complaint of the son, the son who was the son of the son, who was the son of the son, and the son would enter the son knife knife of the knife of the son.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of each police protocol of statement to E and F;

1. Relevant Articles of the Criminal Act and Articles 261 and 260 of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of criminal facts;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is not good, the fact that an agreement is made with the victim, and other factors such as the circumstances leading to the crime, the age, character and conduct of the defendant.