A. From April 2014 to August 2019, the Plaintiff supplied the Defendant with medical devices and expendable items related to cardio-cerebrovascular diseases worth KRW 3,326,483,825 in total.

Since then, as of September 30, 2019, the defendant's claims for the payment of goods against the plaintiff were 472,412,549 won as of September 30, 2019, and 186,672,590 won among them were already due as of the above point.

B. Of the above goods price, the Defendant additionally paid KRW 9,00,000,000 on October 11, 2019, and KRW 10,000,000 on October 18, 2019, and KRW 4,00,000 on November 11, 2019 to the Plaintiff. Accordingly, the goods price that the Defendant is obligated to pay to the Plaintiff as of the date of closing the argument in this case remains KRW 449,412,549.

(A) While the lawsuit in this case is pending, the period of payment for the full amount of KRW 449,412,549 has arrived). [Grounds for recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, the entry of No. 3-1 to 3-3, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. According to the above facts of determination, the defendant is obligated to claim against the plaintiff about the amount of KRW 449,412,549, and 163,672,590 among them, as requested by the plaintiff (i.e., 186,672,590 won for the goods whose maturity comes due as of September 30, 2019 - the total amount of goods additionally repaid between October 11, 2019 and November 11, 2019) as of November 12, 2019, which is the day following the defendant's final repayment date, to dispute over the existence and scope of the defendant's obligation to pay damages for delay calculated at the rate of 12% per annum from the day after the date when the defendant's final payment date was made until July 15, 202, which is the date when the judgment was rendered, and 6% per annum of 12% per annum as to the promotion of litigation, etc.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is justified within the above scope of recognition, and the remainder is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition by applying the proviso of Article 101 of the Civil Procedure Act to the costs of lawsuit.