However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

around 18:00 on October 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) suspected of having contacted with his/her female living together before the ‘C’ factory, which was operated by the Defendant, and (b) suspected of having caused disputes with the victim D (51). The Defendant left two times the parts of the victim’s left shoulder, which are dangerous goods from the Defendant’s cargo vehicle parked at the place, and caused damage to the victim’s shoulder, which is approximately 45cm in total, and approximately 18cm in width.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Complaint;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (Attachment of photofics used for committing the crime);

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Articles 53 and 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act to mitigate small amount;

1. Although the degree of violence on the grounds of sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution does not correspond to that of the Criminal Act, considering the following: (a) the victim’s agreement with the Defendant and does not want the punishment; (b) the victim does not have many victims; and (c) there is no history of punishment exceeding the fine