A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for one year.

Defendant

B shall be punished by a fine of eight million won.

Defendant

B The above fine.

Defendant

A on March 7, 2011, a summary order of KRW 1.5 million was issued by the Cheongju District Court for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on June 25, 2012, a summary order of KRW 3 million was issued for the same crime from the Cheongju District Court’s Assistance, and on September 30, 2013, the Incheon District Court was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for six months and two years, and on January 15, 2016, from the Cheongju District Court’s Assistance to the Cheongju District Court for the same crime, and was sentenced to imprisonment for eight months.

1. Defendant A

A. Violation of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Bodily Injury) Defendant A is a person engaged in driving a car with C low-priced car.

On May 25, 2020, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol 0.190% among the blood transfusions around 03:26, proceeded directly with the national highways 21 of the salary 97-ri, Geumcheon-gun, Geumcheon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnamcheon-gun, Jincheon-gun, in the face of Geumcheon-do, Jin-gun, Jincheon-gun, the two-lanes of the city speed of 70 km in the speed of 50 km.

at the time the defendant was driven by B on the front of the defendant's proceeding

D A6 vehicle stops between the two lanes due to the shock of the center and the center. In such a case, the driver of the vehicle has a duty of care to prevent the traffic accident by accurately manipulating the steering and steering system and accurately operating the steering and steering system.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, by negligence of being negligent in driving sob, has shocked the front part of the vehicle in front of the Defendant, with the front part of the vehicle in front of the Defendant, and continued to stop on one lane with the front part of the Defendant’s front part of the vehicle in front of the Defendant, and collision with the back part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the victim E ( South, age 39), which is the ownership of the victim E (V), and due to that shock, E’s vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant, and the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant in front of the vehicle in question conflicts with the back part of the Defendant’s vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in front of the Defendant in front of the vehicle in front of the vehicle in question, and led to a traffic adjustment at the scene of the accident.