beta
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2020.07.22 2020가단5057123

구상금

Text

1. Defendant B: 47,390,764 won; Defendant C: 23,695,382 won; and each of them from March 13, 2020 to July 22, 2020.

Reasons

1. The following shall be added to the facts listed in the judgment prior to the recognition of the case (A 4-1, B, B(1).

The expenses incurred and the amount paid by the plaintiff against the claim for mutual aid money by the victim shall be as follows:

DDDDDD F [The purport of Gap 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Eul 1, and the whole pleadings]

2. The business owner sharing the responsibility among the joint tortfeasors shall take measures necessary to prevent the danger at a place where workers might fall down at work;

(Article 23 of the Industrial Safety and Health Act). In addition, the owner of a business, part of which is carried on at the same place and which is subject to contract under a contract by separating a part of the business, shall take measures to prevent industrial accidents that may occur when the workers employed by him and his employees work

(Article 29(1) of the Industrial Safety and Health Act. In particular, the above business owner shall take measures to prevent industrial accidents, such as the establishment of safety and health facilities, etc., when his/her employees work at a place where there is a risk of falling or falling, etc. of industrial accidents.

(3) Article 29(3) of the above Act provides that “A business owner shall take necessary measures to prevent the danger of fall, such as taking safety (work) launchs, falling prevention networks, safety risks, etc., in cases where the victim F, an employee, as an employer, is in danger of fall, and the defendant C has the same obligation to take measures as the business owner who subcontracted to the defendant B. Since the defendant B is in the position of employing the victim and supervising the direct management at the site, it is recognized that the defendant B bears a more responsibility for safety management than the defendant C (criminal decision also takes criminal case, and the defendant C is punished by a fine of two million won, and the defendant C is punished by a fine of one million won). In full view of the circumstances, the ratio of liability among them is recognized as 2:1.

Meanwhile, the Defendants and the Plaintiff.