except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The defendant is a ship of Chinese nationality.

1. On January 19, 2014, the injured Defendant: (a) around 16:25, on the front day of Ansan-si, and without any particular reason, went to the victim D(34 years of age) who was under the influence of alcohol and was running a so-called delivery business; (b) thereby walking the victim’s right-hand bucking part at one time; (c) the victim was about to report to 112; (d) the victim was about to report the victim’s face to 112; and (e) on the part of the victim when the victim’s face was taken once by drinking, the victim was on the part of the inner part of the part that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment.

2. On January 19, 2014, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender on the same criminal facts as paragraph (1) of the same Article; and (b) was transferred to the F District of the Police Station in Ansan-si; (c) on the same day, at around 16:49, the Defendant assaulted the said G, such as having been asked by police officers G belonging to the said district on the personal information and the circumstances of the instant case, etc., one time at the left head of the said G; and (d) walking the left head of the said G on one occasion on one hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of police officers' duties in relation to the prevention, suppression, and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused;

1. Statement of police statement related to D and G;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of statutes on site and victim photographs;

1. Relevant Article 257(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. The criminal liability of the defendant who, under Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, injured the victim D without any justifiable reason while under the influence of sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act is not sufficient and there is a need for the corresponding punishment.

However, the fact that the defendant recognized the crime, agreed with the victim D, G, a police officer, submitted a written application to see that he was the front line, and the year 201.