If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

In using and managing a means of access, no one shall lend the means of access while receiving, demanding or promising any compensation therefor.

Nevertheless, on August 2018, the Defendant accepted and consented to the proposal that “I will lend 3.5 million won to the daily account,” from a person who was named as a policeman, and then delivered a physical card, which is a means of access connected to the Defendant’s Saemaul Treasury Account (C) in the name of the Defendant in the name of the Defendant in the name of Kimhae-si, at around 11:00 following that day, to a person who was named in front of the Defendant’s house in the name of the Defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to provide compensation and lent the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the details of transfer of money;

1. Relevant Article 49(4)2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act and Articles 6(3)2 and 6(3)2 of the same Act concerning criminal facts and the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order is that the defendant confessions and reflects a crime, and there is no criminal record exceeding the same criminal record or fine.

However, the act of lending the means of access to electronic financial transactions, such as the instant crime, is in an indivisible relationship with the Bosing crime, and there is a high need for strict sanctions.

In addition, the account of this case was abused for the singishing crime, thereby causing actual damage.

In addition, the defendant's age, career, character and conduct, motive of crime, circumstances after crime, etc. and various circumstances shown in the trial and records shall be determined as ordered.