2. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, such as Defendant’s age, sex behavior, motive for the crime, frequency of the crime, number of crimes, circumstances after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, considering the following factors: (a) the confession of the crime, the confession of the crime, and the active cooperation in the investigation of persons related to phiphonephones; (b) the fact that the receipt of phiphones is a crime for simple medication; (c) the fact that there was several penalties for the same crime; (d) the released from prison after the execution of imprisonment with prison labor for the same kind of crime; and (e) the fact that phiphones were administered several times after the receipt of phiphones, etc., the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior,

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.