beta
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2015.06.11 2015가단249

임금

Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 6,989,248; (b) KRW 6,989,248; (c) KRW 6,98; and (d) KRW 4,193,548; and (d) KRW 4,193,548.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. From November 20, 2013 to December 31, 2014, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) entered into an employment contract with the Defendant, with the amount of KRW 4,166,670 per month (basic subsidy of KRW 3,86,670 per month), the amount of KRW 100,000 per month for the maintenance of vehicles and KRW 200,000 per month for the work period of KRW 3,86,670, the amount of salary was 200,000, the amount of salary was 30,000,000 from January 1, 2014 to December 31, 2014; the amount of salary was 10,000,000 won for the Defendant’s employment contract with the Plaintiff (Appointed Party); the amount of salary was 10,000,000 won for the Selection Party’s employment contract with the Defendant’s 10,010,000 won for the 20.

B. On July 25, 2014, the Defendant issued each notice of dismissal (hereinafter the dismissal of this case) to the selected parties E on July 28, 2014 on the grounds of “a lack of business ability, lack of business lodging, exclusive business approval, and employer instruction objection” with respect to the Plaintiff (Appointed Party), the appointed parties C, and D, and each of the notifications of dismissal reached the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties around that time.

C. On December 12, 2014, the Defendant completed the registration of corporate dissolution by a general meeting of partners and appointed G as a liquidator on the same day.

Based on the premise that the dismissal of this case is null and void, the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the designated parties were sentenced to a judgment in favor of all Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and all of the appointed parties (appointed Party) (hereinafter “former judgment”) from July 26, 2014 to October 22, 2014, respectively, by filing a wage claim lawsuit from July 29, 2014 to October 22, 2014 on the premise that the dismissal of this case is null and void, and the judgment was finalized by the Defendant’s appeal to withdraw the appeal on May 8, 2015.

[Ground of recognition] dispute.