If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

On January 10, 2013, from around 01:30 to around 02:15, the Defendant interfered with the victim’s drinking house business by force, such as: (a) within the “Ez. operated by the second floor victim D of the C-building, an office building in which the Defendant used alcohol to drink, and (b) making the said victim’s marcing, “for the said victim’s marcing year, without a walthy,” and (c) holding the brut in harmony with the telephone; and (d) preventing customers from entering the said victim’s drinking room business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement made to D by the police;

1. On-site photographs (including harmony between the suspect and the suspect);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigation reports (on-site situations, etc.);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;