On August 30, 2018, the Defendant was sentenced to four months of imprisonment with prison labor for assault at Seoul Southern District Court on September 7, 2018 and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 7, 2018.

1. On June 8, 2018, around 23:55, the Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, at the front of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and at the same time, the nameless female players who want to get a taxi was frighted with a trial expenses, and the circumstances leading up to the Seoul Young Military Police Station C District of the Seoul Young Military Police Station, dispatched after receiving a report of the above conduct, shall restrain the Defendant, and demand him to return home, and the said D to the said D “Chewing fright fright. D. f. f. f.

N. N. N. N.N.

Chewing bath theory was used to see the left chest and the shoulder part of the above D at one time by drinking the finger.

Accordingly, the Defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties by police officers concerning the handling of 112 reported cases.

2. On June 9, 2018, around 00:48, the Defendant damaged public goods: (a) within the C District District of Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Police Station located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, Yeongdeungpo-gu, Seoul, on the ground that he was arrested in the act of committing an act of committing an offense as stated in the foregoing paragraph 1, and the Defendant did not unfasten the locks that he was faced with the Defendant’s hand in order to ensure the safety and the prevention of escape, and (b) walking back the books in front of the employees in the above C District situation at hand, he left the string of the timber so that part of the string of the vehicle remains far away; and (c) continuously asked the sticker with the seat of the waiting seat.

Accordingly, the Defendant damaged the goods used by public offices.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A damaged photograph;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of inquiry letter, such as criminal history (A) and text of the judgment;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 136(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 141(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment for a crime;

1. After Article 37 of the Criminal Act, Article 39 (1) of the same Act:

1. The reason for sentencing Article 37 (former part), Article 38 (1) 2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act is not good, and the defendant has a lot of history to punish the same crime.