However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On March 4, 2018, around 01:15, the Defendant was living together with the foregoing house within the extent of 3:401 of the Mac-gu, Ansan City in which he/she had his/her residence.

D and body fighting, and the assistant F, who is a public official of the police officer belonging to the Ansan Police Station E police box, called the above body fighting and tried to separate the defendant from D, and the f reported this f to the police box by this f, who reported this f to the police box.

The theory of “bucking,” and the rank of F, which was carried out by hand, was removed by knee and knebbbbbbbs, and assaulted by knee and knebbbbbs, once each.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the handling of 112 reported cases by judicial police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the law of the police statement protocol to F;

1. Relevant Article 136 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition on the grounds of not less than Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (a favorable circumstance, such as the absence of any record of punishment exceeding half and fine).