2. The judgment of the defendant reflects the wrong and the distance from driving is short, and in particular, it is recognized that all of the crimes were voluntarily surrendered by telephone to the police on the following day of the instant case.

However, the crime of this case was committed by stealing the name of G, which is a punishment for the purpose of avoiding punishment without being limited to driving under the influence of alcohol, and thus, the quality of the crime is bad, and the defendant was punished for driving under the influence of alcohol, and the case was discovered when the defendant was discovered while driving without a license for driving under the influence of alcohol, and was almost the same as the crime of this case.

In addition, although the defendant voluntarily surrenders as above, he did not cooperate with the investigation after that, and there are no new circumstances to consider in the appellate court.

In light of such circumstances and other conditions of sentencing as the Defendant’s age, character and conduct, environment, background and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the lower court cannot be deemed to be too unreasonable, considering the circumstances after the crime.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.