beta
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.02.20 2017고단6134

자동차손해배상보장법위반등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. The Defendant, “2017 Highest 6134,” was a person who owns C-wing and Ⅲ Cargo not covered by mandatory insurance, and driven the said truck from the 731-5 front of the funeral fright in the event of the movement of the wife population around 10:04 on September 10, 2017 to the 14nd road of the same Gu, and without obtaining a driver’s license from the 10km section to the 14nd road of the 1299 road.

2. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA car. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA car.

On July 22, 2017, the Defendant operated the said car without obtaining a driver's license of the said car, and changed the said car into one lane in order to make a U.S., while driving the said car, which is located in the 210-37 sub-lease 210-37 on behalf of the head of the Shi/Mapo-si, in order to make a two-lane in front of the sub-lease 210-37 on the boundary of the Shi/Mapo-si Office, in order to make a U.S., while driving the said car with no mandatory insurance.

At night, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents, such as changing the lane by notifying the person engaged in driving of the vehicle of the direction in advance, after checking whether there is a vehicle driving in the first lane by checking the right and the right and the right and the right of the vehicle.

Nevertheless, according to the evidence duly adopted and examined by this court, when the defendant neglected this and changed the lane to a one-lane, it seems that the "the left-hand side" stated in the written indictment appears to be a clerical error. The "the left-hand side" in the written indictment seems to be a clerical error.

The part was received as a part of the back wheeler on the left side of the Defendant’s vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant’s negligence in the above occupational negligence caused the Victim E and the victim G (26 years old) who was on board the said cruise car to need approximately two weeks medical treatment.