beta
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2017.06.30 2016고단1399

재물손괴등

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Damage to property;

A. On September 10, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 19:32, the 103-dong 1207-dong 103-dong 1207, the Defendant: (b) opened the entrance to the Dogsan-si Dag-si 103-dong 103-dong 1207 on the ground that the victim D, residing there, did not open the entrance; (c) caused the first race to be repaired; and (d) continuously damaged the effectiveness of the entrance by spreading the substance of the lower

B. At around 21:00 on September 11, 2016, the Defendant filed a complaint on the ground that the victim D was free from disturbance, at the same place as Paragraph (a) and on the ground that the victim D was free from disturbance.

Using the main entrance stating the contents of “,” etc., the entrance was attached to the victim’s office entrance and was thereby harming the utility of the entrance.

(c)

Defendant on September 12, 2016, at the same place as Paragraph 1.A, around 21:00, and on the ground that the victim D’s disturbance was avoided, “I do not have to do so.”

Using the main entrance stating the contents of “,” etc., the entrance was attached to the victim’s office entrance and was thereby harming the utility of the entrance.

(d)

From September 15, 2016 to around 19:00 on the following day, the Defendant: (a) from around 12:20 on September 15, 2016 to around 19:00 on the day; and (b) on the ground that the victim D’s disturbance was avoided, the Defendant filed a complaint with the victim and his family members on the victim’s house entrance at the victim’s house.

Using the main entrance stating the contents of “,” etc., the entrance was attached to the victim’s office entrance and was thereby harming the utility of the entrance.

Accordingly, the defendant damaged the victim's property so that the repair cost is not awarded more than four times in total.

2. On September 16, 2016, around 21:15, the Defendant: (a) sought a disturbance in the same place as paragraph (a) of 1.1; (b) sought the victim’s house door at the victim E (23 years old); and (c) assaulted the victim by putting the victim’s breath and spathing with the victim’s breath, while doing a dispute with the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of the police officers of the accused;

1.Each of D, F, and E.