However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

The Defendant, at around 22:00 on September 25, 2017, at the “C main point” located in Seocheon-si B around 22:0, and at the time of the victim D (52) who is the customer, the Defendant demanded that the Defendant, who was in a dispute with the owner and was in operation of the singing machine, would be imprisingly requested by him, and he would die the victim by gathering the beer’s disease on the table, putting him up, cutting off, and ring the beer’s disease on the table, putting him up the beer’s disease on the table, putting it off on the part of the damaged party’s side, and throw it away.

“Armony” has reached a sound.

Accordingly, the defendant carried dangerous objects and threatened the victim.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each police statement protocol (list 3, 4) with respect to E and D;

1. Application of relevant Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph (list 1,17);

1. Relevant provisions of the Criminal Act and Articles 284 and 283 (1) of the Criminal Act, the punishment of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (the confession, reflectivity, the stay of execution before and after 40 years ago, and one time before 40 years ago, and the same small fine before and after 9 years thereafter, no criminal punishment shall be imposed; the victim shall not be punished by imprisonment with prison labor due to contingent crimes in the state of his/her driving;

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code of the Social Service Order