If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

At around 14:20 on October 27, 2013, the Defendant: (a) 14:20, the Defendant went to the D convenience store operated by the victim C, which was operated by the Government-Si of the Gyeonggi-si; (b) without any justifiable reason, and (c) ran his employees E at the above location “in daily reduction,” and pushed the sccalculator installed on the display stand by hand so as not to operate the victim’s home heavy weight machinery, which was installed on the display stand, thereby damaging the aesthetic property at the market price; and (d) continued to damage the victim F, a customer who bought tobacco at the above place, without any justifiable reason, she saw the victim’s f to read “whether he was aware that he was aware that he was aware of it.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Simple statements in E and F preparation;

1. Application of statutes on photographs of damage;

1. Articles 366 and 260 (1) of the Criminal Act and the selection of fines for the crime in question;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;