2. The Defendant did not commit the instant crime, i.e., taking money against many unspecified persons, or having attempted to do so, and the Defendant’s liability for such crime is not against other unspecified persons.

However, the defendant reflects the crime of this case, and again, the defendant does not commit the same mistake.

In addition, the total amount of damage caused by the instant crime is not more than 30,000 won, and some victims and victims want to agree with the Defendant.

In addition, considering the fact that the defendant is a person with a disability of class 2 in the hearing disability, the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, the details and details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, etc., the sentencing conditions as shown in the records and arguments in this case cannot be deemed unfair because the sentence imposed by the court below is too uneasible.

Therefore, the prosecutor's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the prosecutor's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.