However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On December 11, 2007, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of one million won or more due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act, etc. in the credit branch of Suwon District Court on December 11, 2007, and on February 10, 2009, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years or more due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act.

Despite the fact that the Defendant had been punished twice or more for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) as above, the Defendant driven Datob while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.085% over the 2km section from the roads near convenience stores located in Sungnam-si B around the same time area from November 7, 2018 to the female investigation distance located in the same time area.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Report on the circumstantial statements of a drinking driver, report on the circumstances of a drinking driver, and notification on the results of the crackdown on drinking;

1. Previous convictions indicated in the judgment: Application of criminal records, inquiry reports (A) and Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant Article of the Act on Criminal Facts, Articles 148-2 (1) 1 and 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act, the choice of punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. Article 53 or 55 (1) 3 of the Criminal Act for discretionary mitigation (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 201Do1448, Apr. 1, 201; Supreme Court Decision 201Do129

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act ( repeatedly considering the favorable circumstances);

1. Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act to provide community service or attend lectures;