When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

1. No person who violates the Railroad Safety Act shall interfere with the performance of duties of railroad workers by intimidation;

On July 8, 2016, at around 23:40 on July 23:40, 2016, the Defendant exceeded, and locked from, a passenger chaired under C Station C Station platform in Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City. The Defendant: (a) the Defendant: (b) caused the Defendant’s safety by the C Station C station service, which caused the Defendant’s shoulder; and (c) shoulder the Defendant; and (d) without any reason, the Defendant “one drinking son” against the said D without reason; (b)

In doing so, “Absted to this fraud,” the said D was assaulted in such a way as to cut off the identification card for an employee who was suffering from the said D, cut off twice the face side of the said D with the left hand hand, and attempted to drive away the above D’s sexual flag, and to remove the Defendant’s personal injury, thereby obstructing the said D’s lawful performance of duties concerning the service of the said D and the maintenance of order in railroad facilities.

2. The Defendant damaged property by assaulting the victim D, such as the date, time, at the place, as described in paragraph 1, at the time, and in paragraph 1, and thereby destroying the victim’s “to take photographs of a cell phone if the victim continues to do so and submit such images to the police.” The Defendant, who is the victim on the victim’s own seat, laid one cell phone at the bottom of the market value of KRW 800,000,000, which is the victim’s market value

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against D;

1. A photo of the damaged part;

1. Photographs of damaged articles;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs by capturing CCTV images;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 78(1) and 49(2) of the Act on the Safety of Railroad from which punishment is selected, Article 366 of the Criminal Act, and the choice of fines;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act appears to have the attitude of recognizing and reflecting the crime, and the fact that the defendant agreed with the victim is favorable.