except that the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

At around 03:30 on February 22, 2014, the Defendant became a vision for the following reasons: (a) the Defendant satisfing in a singing room in the following cities C.

The Defendant, upon receiving a report, expressed the Defendant’s desire to restrain the Defendant, who was the victim of the defect that the scam F from a slope of the Yansan Police Station E District EdistrictF, was sent to the scene, and expressed to the Defendant that “pice F (the 43 years of age), “pice scambling scam,” “hambling scam,” “this scambling scam,” “I will scam the police officer if the scamscam,” and “I will not scam the scambling scam,” and “I will interfere with the proper performance of duties regarding the suppression of the police officer’s crime by assaulting the victim’s scambs at once, etc., and at the same time, the said victim interfered with the performance of duties by the police officer regarding the suppression of the crime.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement related to F and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of each photograph and written diagnosis of injury;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (Punishment on which the punishment is heavier than that of an injury);

1. Selection of imprisonment with prison labor chosen;

1. Suspension of execution under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (The fact that a person commits a violation, has not committed the same criminal records, and deposits 50,000 won for the victim);