요양불승인처분취소
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
1. The reasons why the court has used for this case is the same as the entry of the reasons for the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, this case is cited in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
In light of the following circumstances, the first instance court: (a) before the instant accident occurred, the Plaintiff suffered from vertebrate chronology due to congenital chronological malutism; (b) the Plaintiff was treated in the F Hospital and G Hospital immediately after the instant accident; and (c) the Plaintiff was unable to receive a diagnosis on the injury of the relevant injury due to the diagnosis after the traffic accident; (d) it is very exceptional that it is difficult to view that the Plaintiff was unable to discover the injury of the relevant injury due to the aftermath of the instant accident; and (e) it is difficult to consider that the Plaintiff was additionally frightened due to the aftermath of the instant accident; (e) there was a serious mardomination in around June 2012, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by E Hospital; and (e) there was a possibility that the Plaintiff’s Mau Hospital could not be excluded from the Plaintiff’s external chronological mal marine 1-N Hospital’s opinion on the instant accident; and (e) there was an external 1-N Hospital.
In full view of the fact that the Plaintiff’s medical opinion that the “the frame No. 10-11” itself is not confirmed, and that there is no difference in the degree of injury suffered by the Plaintiff when comparing the results of the examination before and after the instant accident, the injury was caused No. 10-11 by the instant accident.
In addition, the accident of this case between the upper branch and the accident of this case.