A Imprisonment for eight months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 4 million won, and Defendant C shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

[criminal records] Defendant A was sentenced to a fine of five million won for a crime of violation of the Act on the Punishment of Acts, such as Intermediation of Commercial Sex Acts, etc. at the Seoul Eastern District Court on June 26, 2015, and on November 17, 2015, in the Incheon District Court Branch of the Incheon District Court on October, 2015, who was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for the same crime, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 25, 2015.

[2] On May 1, 2016, the Defendants prepared an officetel, etc. and arranged commercial sex acts by employing female employees; and Defendant A and Defendant B shared the rent to arrange commercial sex acts; and Defendant A’s interference with commercial sex acts through “E”, a Internet sex trafficking site, the Defendants distributed the role that the Defendants would take sex purchases into the place of commercial sex acts using “B” F.

Accordingly, from May 29, 2016 to May 21, 2000, Defendants made use of the loan 201, 301, 401, 401, and 402 located in Ulsan-gu G, Ulsan-gu, Ulsan-do, to the above place, and had H and I, female employees, who were employed by receiving KRW 100,000 in cash, enter the same sex relationship.

Accordingly, the Defendants jointly arranged sexual traffic for business purposes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H or I;

1. Application of statutes on field photographs;

1. Articles 19 (2) 1 and 30 of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Imprisonment; the choice of punishment;

B. Defendant B and C: Selection of fine

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse (Defendant B and C);

1. Additional collection (Defendant A and B) The reason for sentencing Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic is that Defendant A committed the act of arranging sexual traffic on the two occasions in 2015, and the punishment of the fine and the disposition of suspended execution are not completely divided, but the short term is not divided.