A. On December 21, 2003, while the network C (hereinafter “C”) owned each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant telecom”) and died on December 21, 2003. The immediately preceding C and his spouse, the Plaintiff, the Defendant, and D, and E, who were his spouse, agreed to transfer the above telecom’s shares in accordance with the legal shares of each heir, including the Plaintiff, to the Defendant and E on March 21, 2003, on the ground that the inheritance of the instant telecom, tax issues and efficient operation issues, etc. were related to the inheritance of the instant telecom. Accordingly, C, on March 21, 2003, donated one-half shares of the above telecom.

B. Although Defendant and E completed a transfer registration under the name of the Plaintiff and E in accordance with C’s gift of the instant her shares, even after C’s death, the instant her shares had been mainly operated by the Plaintiff and E. In the process, there was a conflict between the Plaintiff and E surrounding the instant her shares, such as: (a) the Defendant, who is the title holder of 1/2 shares of the instant her shares among the instant her shares, raises an issue with the Plaintiff regarding the operation of the her her agreements, such as distribution of the sales

C. Accordingly, on April 8, 2012, F, the Defendant’s three villages, had convened a family conference in order to discuss appropriate solutions for the operation, disposition, etc. of the instant franchise. From that standpoint, the Defendant and E prepared and implemented a letter of intent to transfer the ownership of the instant franchise to the Plaintiff (hereinafter “each of the instant notes”).

【Ground of recognition】 The fact that there has been no dispute, Gap's 1 through 4, 9, 10 evidence, Eul's 1 through 3 (including additional statements; hereinafter the same shall apply), witness D's testimony and whole purport of pleading

2. Determination on the cause of the claim

A. According to the above facts, the defendant's obligation to transfer ownership is established, barring special circumstances, as agreed in the letter of this case to the plaintiff.