The punishment of the court below (4 months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

Judgment

The fact that the defendant recognized his mistake and that all the victims agreed is favorable.

However, there is a record of punishment several times as a crime of interference with the same kind of violent business, including probation, and the fact that the crime was committed during the probation period is disadvantageous to the defendant. In full view of the background of the crime in this case, the circumstances after the crime, the defendant's age, character and conduct, and environment, as well as various sentencing conditions as shown in the argument in this case, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the defendant's assertion is

Therefore, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.