퇴직금
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
1. Summary of the instant claim and its determination
A. The gist of the instant claim is as follows: (a) the Plaintiff, while serving as an auditor and an internal director for six years in the Defendant Company, retired on December 31, 2016; and (b) even though the Defendant Company agreed to pay retirement pay by January 31, 2017, he/she did not pay it up to the present day; and (c) thus, the Plaintiff seeks payment.
B. In full view of the purport of the entire arguments as to the evidence Nos. 1 and Nos. 1 through 3 of the judgment, the plaintiff can be acknowledged that the plaintiff, while divorced with the representative of the defendant company C on September 12, 2016, transferred his pay and retirement allowance to the above C and agreed to allow them to use them as child support, etc. between the plaintiff and C. Thus, the plaintiff's retirement allowance to the defendant company was terminated upon completion of the payment, and the plaintiff's assertion that C, the representative of the defendant company, agreed to pay the above retirement allowance to the plaintiff has no evidence to acknowledge this.
2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.