2. The crime of this case was committed by Defendant A, upon receiving a report that the Defendants are wraped by the Defendants, and assaulted by the body of the victimized police officers in the manner of body while taking the Defendant’s bath. Defendant B was sealed with the victim police officers I by her body, her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her face, and the crime of interference with the performance of official duties like this case needs to be punished strictly, in order to establish the state’s legal order and eradicate her her her her her her her s her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her sher her her sher her her her her, and did not know her her her.

However, in light of the fact that the Defendants made a confession of the crime of this case, and the Defendants deposited KRW 2 million in depth for the recovery of damage to H by the victimized police officer, Defendant A did not have any history of criminal punishment prior to the instant case, Defendant A complained of the Defendants’ wife, equity in sentencing with the same similar case, the Defendants’ age, sexual conduct, environment, motive and background leading to the instant crime, means and consequence, and all other factors of sentencing as indicated in the records and arguments of this case, such as the circumstances after the commission of the crime, etc., it is not deemed unfair because each of the punishments imposed by the lower court is unafford and unfair.

3. Conclusion, prosecutor.