A. In fact-finding injury caused by the Defendants’ injury, the victim L did not constitute a serious injury even though the victim suffered from an incurable disease, such as the damage of eyesight due to deterioration of eyesight, etc.

The judgment of the court below contains an error of mistake of facts.

B. The court below asserts that the defendants' punishment (the defendants and the prosecutor) declared by the court below against the defendants (the defendant A 4 years of imprisonment and the defendant B 3 years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable, and the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair. On the contrary, the court asserts that the prosecutor is too unfasible and unfair.

2. As a result of the examination conducted on August 19, 2016, the lower court determined as to the assertion of misunderstanding of the facts in this part, i.e., the following circumstances found to be comprehensively taken into account the adopted evidence, i.e., the victim L suffered from injury, such as flady sule, pule and sule, pule, pule and sule, and sule, within the left part; however, on September 19, 2016, the Defendant completely cured red suleitis was completely cured and was completely absorbed fladule, but the damage to the yellow sule cell floor was observed on November 21, 2016; the doctor is expected to recover 80% or more of the sule cell, but it is difficult to expect how much the sule is now, and it seems that it was necessary for the victim to observe the 19th anniversary of the sule and the 19th anniversary of the disease.

It is difficult to see

The decision was determined.

Examining the above judgment of the court below in comparison with the records, the judgment of the court below is just and acceptable, and it is so argued by the prosecutor of the court below.