Seized evidence No. 1 shall be confiscated.

The Defendant worked in the same Article with the Defendant on January 31, 2018 while serving as security guards of Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Library from January 2015.

D Around two hours after having met E, which is a director of the management affairs of D, immediately received notice of dismissal from the above E.

1. On January 31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) at Jongno-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Library Security Guards around 17:30 on January 31, 2018, the Defendant thought that he was dismissed due to the victim D, who had been working as the Defendant at the time; and (b) assaulted the victim by drinking at his face.

2. Destruction of special property and damage to property on January 31, 2018;

A. The Defendant destroyed property equivalent to KRW 4,795,00 in total market value, such as destroying three computer monitors in the market value of KRW 90,00,00 managed by the head of the Victim C Borrowing Management Affairs Center E on the floor on the ground that he/she did not do so after assaulting D as referred to in the preceding paragraph.

B. The Defendant continued to locate CBD’s management office located in the CBD guard room, and caused the damage to the Defendant’s property worth KRW 905,000,000, which is the total market price, by breaking the customer’s interest equivalent to KRW 150,000 and the book value equivalent to KRW 75,000, the market price managed by E in the CBD management office. The Defendant damaged the property that is equivalent to KRW 200,00,000, which is the market price managed by the damaged person by using the cell screen, which is a dangerous object.

3. On February 5, 2018, the Defendant was expected to receive benefits and retirement allowances from the Defendant, but the victim E (64 years old) who was the manager of CBC, could not receive benefits and retirement allowances from the Defendant on the grounds of damages, etc. to damage the property as referred to in the preceding paragraph, and the Defendant was able to kill the victim by using the knife in custody of the Defendant’s knife, which had been accumulated during the process of explosion with respect to dismissal, etc.

The Defendant on February 6, 2018