게임산업진흥에관한법률위반방조
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the sentence (a fine of KRW 10 million, confiscation) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.
2. In full view of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) the Defendant’s business period related to the instant crime was not long-term; (c) the social harm of the instant illegal game room operation is serious; (d) the Defendant provided game products for the use of the unclassified game products; and (e) there is no change in circumstances or circumstances that may be newly considered in sentencing; and (e) other circumstances, such as the Defendant’s character and conduct, environment, motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) the motive, means, and consequence of the instant crime; and (e) all the circumstances that are conditions for sentencing as indicated in the instant argument and the record, the sentence imposed by the lower court
Therefore, the defendant's assertion of unfair sentencing is without merit.
3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.
[However, since Article 70(1) of the Criminal Act on the confinement of work site in the application of the law of the court below is obvious that it is a clerical error, it shall be corrected to "Article 70 of the former Criminal Act (amended by Act No. 12575, May 14, 2014)".