beta
(영문) 서울고등법원 2020.09.04 2020노203

중상해

Text

The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

The defendant shall pay medical expenses to the applicant for compensation 30,969.

Reasons

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

가. 피고인 1) 사실오인 내지 법리오해 피고인이 손바닥으로 피해자의 얼굴을 1회 때린 행위로 피해자는 엉덩방아를 찧었고(1차 충격), 그 후 피해자는 바닥에 드러누웠으며, 피고인과 H이 바닥에 누워 있던 피해자를 일으키려고 할 때 피해자가 이를 뿌리치다가 스스로 뒤로 넘어지면서 머리를 바닥에 부딪쳤다(2차 충격). 즉 피고인의 행위와 무관하게 발생한 2차 충격으로 인해 피해자가 경막밑 출혈 등으로 인한 인지기능의 영구 장애의 결과에 이른 것으로, 피고인의 행위와 중상해 결과 사이에 인과관계를 인정할 수 없다. 그런데도 피고인의 행위로 중상해 결과가 발생하였다고 판단한 원심판결에는 사실오인 내지 법리오해의 위법이 있다. 2) 양형부당 원심이 선고한 형(징역 2년)은 너무 무거워서 부당하다.

B. Prosecutor 1) In light of the erroneous determination of facts and misapprehension of legal principles (as to the acquittal portion in the reason), the Defendant may be sufficiently recognized. Nevertheless, the lower court acquitted the Defendant of serious injury on the ground that there is no evidence to acknowledge it. In so doing, the lower court erred by misapprehending the legal principles or misapprehending the legal principles. 2) The sentence sentenced by the lower court of unfair sentencing is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. Prior to the judgment on the grounds for ex officio appeal following the amendment of the indictment, the prosecutor examined the victim's face in the first instance trial, and the prosecutor took the victim's part in the case where "the victim's face was faced with a serious injury on the recognition function of permanent disorder caused by blood transfusion under the margin of external wound by putting the victim's face one time with his hand," in the indictment, "as a matter of drinking, the victim's part of the victim's face, which has been sucked on the left side of the victim's face, is cleeped, and the victim's sloping with the right side, and kicked with the shock.