1. Although the Defendant did not obtain from D the authority to lease 18 households’ studio on the 3 and 4th floor of the building E in the building E, the Defendant: (a) on January 7, 2011, at G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in F at the G Licensed Real Estate Agent Office located in F at the Si of the real estate lease agreement, the “location E” and “the part to be leased” in the “E business studio 304”; and (b) on the “security deposit”, the Defendant entered the personal information of D into the computer and printed it out after printing it out, and marked D’s seal prior to the name.

As a result, the Defendant forged one copy of the real estate lease agreement in the name of D, a private document on rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering, and exercised the forged real estate lease agreement to H, a lessee, as if it was a document that was duly formed.

In addition, the Defendant forged and exercised the real estate lease agreement in the name of D over 25 times in the same manner as the attached crime sight table.

2. On January 21, 2011, the Defendant: (a) entered the terms “D” into “D” column; (b) entered the terms “B” into “D” column; (c) entered the terms “B” and printed it into “D” column; and (d) affix a seal prior to the name of the delegating Party “B”, pursuant to an agreement under Article 2 (a). The delegating Party A delegated all acts pertaining thereto; and (d) consented by the delegating Party B. Article 2: (a) entered the terms “B” into the terms “D” and inserted it into “D” column; and (b) inserted the terms “B” in advance.

Accordingly, the defendant, for the purpose of uttering, has forged a letter of delegation in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations, and has forged it to the J of I Licensed Real Estate Agent Office at around that time.