1. Around 09:06 on May 31, 2018, the Defendant: (a) 09:06, in front of the victim D’s room located in the Jungdong-gu Seoul Central District District Public Notice C, expressed the victim’s desire to “patch patch patch patp. patp. p.p.; and (b) fat the victim’s fatp.m. with the victim’s hand to “dat the victim’s fatp. p.m. p. p.m. c.,” and fat the victim’s fatp.m. with the victim’s hand, she dump and sat the victim’s fat at the victim’s room, she satd and satddd the victim’s fat at the victim’s catp.m.

2. The Defendant interfered with the operation of the victim E, who is the operator of B published source, by force, interfered with the operation of the Institute by avoiding disturbance, such as the time, time, place, etc. described in paragraph (1), and the humping, etc., as described in paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement of E (second time);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes concerning D police statements;

1. Relevant Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314(1) of the Criminal Act, and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor for the crime;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the reasons for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act recognize and reflects the Defendant’s crimes, and the Defendant was sentenced to six months imprisonment at the Seoul Northern District Court (2018 High Court Decision 2431) due to special intimidation, etc., and if the Defendant was punished as concurrent crimes under the former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, the punishment shall be determined as ordered by taking into account all anticipated sentences and the conditions for sentencing under Article 51 of the Criminal Act as stated in the records.