However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

On October 6, 2014, at around 04:45, the Defendant: (a) did not go to a customer even after the business was completed at the main station located in the Busan So-gu C, Busan; (b) when the Defendant was demanded the police officer F to return home from the E Zone, who was called up after receiving a 112-report from the main station located in the E Zone; and (c) went out outside the police officer, on the ground that the said police officer was prevented from stopping the taxi on the street before the said main station, on the ground that the said police officer would stop away from the taxi due to the defect in which the business owner would attempt to get out of the taxi; and (d) the Defendant was pushed off the chest of the above police officer, and “I am less am, you am, and you am.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning crime prevention and maintenance of order of the police officer.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement concerning G and F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on investigation reporting;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act and the choice of imprisonment with prison labor concerning the crime;

1. The reason for the sentencing of Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended sentence [Scope of Recommendation] The sentence is determined as per the disposition, taking into account the following circumstances: (a) there is no basic area (6 to 1 year and 4 months) of the obstruction of performance of official duties (a person who has been subject to special punishment] (a decision of sentence] the degree of assault against police officers; (b) the defendant is against the law; and (c) there is no criminal power imposed on the defendant beyond the fine.